this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
5 points (77.8% liked)

World News

32300 readers
410 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ten Chinese air force aircraft entered Taiwan's air defence zone . . . Of those aircraft, the ministry said 10 had either crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait, which previously served as an unofficial barrier between the two sides, or entered the southwestern part of Taiwan's air defence identification zone, or ADIZ.

For those unfamiliar with the Air Defense Identification Zone:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Defense_Identification_Zone_(Taiwan)

Not only does it include a lot of water that isn't part of the Strait, right off of China's coast, it also includes a portion of Mainland China a few times larger than Taiwan itself.

People like to talk like China is flying jets over Taipei City, but you can fly a plane from one city in Mainland China to another, only passing over land, and be in this zone. Mind you, I don't think Taiwan having this zone is bad -- countries generally should be aware of air traffic nearby -- but this is part of a long history of alarmist headlines by western media regarding what is often very uninteresting air traffic in the PRC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

So Chinese bots are on lemmy too now. You obviously didn't read the article - "Of those aircraft, the ministry said 10 had either crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait, which previously served as an unofficial barrier between the two sides, or entered the southwestern part of Taiwan's air defence identification zone, or ADIZ."

In international relations, militaries have defined and at times unspoken rules of engagement. This was NOT routine flight over mainland China that you are making out to be, but was a clear breach of said protocols. Thus Taiwan sent its fighter jets to observe the Chinese military aircraft.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Everyone who disagrees with me must be a bot.

I bet your response will contain one of more of the following: Winnie the Pooh, social credit, comrade, Uyghurs. Yet you call others bots, lmao.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Uyghurs are experiencing a genocide in China and you think it's spamming to bring it up?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Did you hear that on Fox News?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I can't believe people are still trying to peddle this conspiracy theory in year 2023.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I'm so tired of the notion that anyone not being in line with certain narratives is automatically considered a drone.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You both quoted the same exact piece of text. You said they didn't read the article but you didn't even bother to read their comment?

You are calling a human being a bot, literally dehumanizing them, because they don't have the same hatred of China as you. You should really check yourself. You are full of hatred and ideological poison. It is clear from your comment that you have limited literacy skills and understanding, you should check out some other perspectives and try to broaden your horizons. Here is one. This is also another incredible resource with a lot of essays and information with a different perspective

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh another no post history user! welcome to fediverse!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

the user you just replied to made their account a year ago and has an extensive post history

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We should give @[email protected] benefit of the doubt. Sometimes when people view other's profile from another instance, the post history shows up empty.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

benefit of the doubt.

bugs-no

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

And yet that dude is the one calling people bots

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

No no never engage their statement on it's alleged merits. Kick them in the [redacted] and then ask them why they can't walk while laughing. It is the weirding way.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So Chinese bots are on lemmy too now.

Amazing how comfortable you are being racist on a public forum.

Anyway, people should look at this map and take note of how far Taiwan's ADIZ extends into Fujian province of mainland China and the open ocean (which is the southwest corner the PRC's airplanes were supposedly encroaching on). These articles are obviously published to make China seem more aggressive than it really is. Meanwhile the US, with the most powerful navy in the world, parades its warships through the Taiwan strait, which for some reason is not seen as a threat or provocation. Also Taiwan claims the mainland as its own territory. Oh, poor little Taiwan. Lol, get off it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is calling out a Chinese bot or Russian bot racist? You are obviously pro-China and you didn't read the article. That makes you a Chinese bot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You are obviously pro-China (...). That makes you a Chinese bot.

At long last, we've reached the molten core of psychotic liberal solipsism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Dudes making us wheel of time fans look fucking terrible smh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Anti Chinese government, pro Chinese people. Just don’t mention how many Chinese people actually support their government

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

That's precisely the sort of argument one would expect from a NAFO bot. Hope you earned enough FICO credit points to buy food tonight.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I literally quoted the part that you just also quoted, which specifies that some of the craft were merely in the ADIZ, the one thing I was talking about in my comment

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

So Chinese bots are on lemmy too now

PIGPOOPBALLS

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

back to reddit with you

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, so lets ask the people living there (not those in power) what they want with their country.

... oh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because a poll asking a direct question is a hell of a lot more accurate in gauging how the population feels about the issue.

Political parties can lose elections for their stances/actions outside their main one -- which seems to have been the case per the actual person from Taiwan that responded to your comment. It doesn't matter what a party is called or what their main goals are if they're bad at their job.

If and when the people of Taiwan decide they want reunification, it will happen. Thankfully Beijing isn't going to be allowed to force the issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You want polls, how about this poll conducted by a Taiwanese university where the majority of Taiwanese want neither reunification nor independence, but the status quo? The majority of Taiwanese people wanting the status quo lines up with how the pro-independence party ate shit while the pro-status quo party made huge gains. The DPP got BTFO so hard the current DPP president Tsai Ing-wen had to resign as party head.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, obviously it's a glorified puppet state but there's no point in arguing from that standpoint here. If a country is to exist, it should know about local air traffic, that's all I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A glorified puppet state? What do you mean?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I started writing out a timeline but I don't know what position you're asking from so I will say for the sake of brevity that the US kept the KMT from being run out of all of China so that the US could us the island as a threat against China -- as it also attempted to do in Korea when it had more-or-less complete control of the southern half. Taiwan spent about 40 years as a military dictatorship killing tens of thousands of dissidents, native Formosans, and others (this was called the "White Terror"), while their patron the US looked the other way while it pumped resources into the country (for the ruling class, mind you) to use the island as a sweatshop site in the interim. This legacy and its connections to fellow US puppet South Korea and US ally Japan go a long way to explaining its current capacity in manufacturing, which make up its other value to the US besides geographical position.

Both Taiwan and SK have made various attempts to assert themselves (with some success in both cases), but with the pathetic diplomatic position of the former and the continued military occupation of the latter by the US, I think "puppet state" is a fair title for them, perhaps as much as Israel, but that's its own can of worms.

I didn't really intend on getting into litigating this topic, but I'm happy to discuss it as best I can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I started writing out a timeline but I don't know what position you're asking from so I will say for the sake of brevity that the US kept the KMT from being run out of all of China [...] which make up its other value to the US besides geographical position.

Yes, I know about its not-so-glorious past and the White Terror. Thousands of innocent civilians were killed. It was terrible. However, I must respectfully disagree with you on the "puppet state" part. I don't think that Taiwan is a puppet state. The US sponsoring Taiwan is a thing of the past. Neither is a pathetic diplomatic position a good reason for being a puppet state.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't see this reply before. The other commenter has it right that the relevance of its pathetic diplomatic position is that it is being propped up by the US/NATO and ultimately depends on them to exist apart from the PRC, which makes it very difficult to oppose them. Incidentally, does the US not sponsor Taiwan? Even just recently there was this, which sure seems like sponsorship to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Apparently being sponsored by a foreign state is now counted as being a puppet state?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if US support dropped overnight, reunification with the mainland would become inevitable. it's a puppet state in the sense that it's propped up by the might of the US/NATO military.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's kind of a weird way to define a puppet state IMO, because you could make the same case for a lot of countries. Like the US supports the Mexican government, and would have likely already been overthrown by the Sinoloa Cartel without US support. So is Mexico a puppet state?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hey now that you mention this, it does kind of make less sense. But I think I should be taking a break from this horrible post. There is no use arguing with someone that is completely unwilling to change their mind. Look at my comment history. I've already wasted hours.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Not only did the US turn a blind eye to the White Terror, but they were positively gleeful about it, as a key target of it was of course not only indigeneous-politics based, but fundamentally anti-communist.

Indeed a basic presupposition of the US providing you such extensive economic support, as a forward base in Asia against communism, is that you crush any opposition to its 'proper' functioning as such an economic and military asset. That supposes that you will crush any radical, labor, trade-union, let alone explicitly socialist or communist activity which appears to challenge the state.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not to exist. I don’t care about their air borders and I hope China flies wherever they please within Chinese territory like Chinese Taipei

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The PRC wants a peaceful reunification, which would not be aided by them continuously flying military jets over the island. I, too, would prefer peaceful reunification, which means some level of cooperation and tolerance is necessary.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

It's going to require might and pressure and gunboat diplomacy, it's denial and liberalism to pretend colonialists just give up their holdings