Based on currently available numbers, there are about 31 vacant housing units for every homeless person in the U.S.
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
555 points (95.7% liked)
US Authoritarianism
813 readers
407 users here now
Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.
There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree
See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link
Cool People: [email protected]
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No matter what, America first. So yes, clearly. Why TF would I prefer some random illegal immigrant to take up housing on U.S. soil when we have homeless people? It's ass backwards to give illegal immigrants any privilege over American citizens.
The only True Americans I know that aren't illegal immigrants or descendants of illegal immigrants:
Try to stay on topic. We understand you hate minorities but that is not being discussed here. The article is about how there's more empty dwellings than homeless people. We both agree that is absurd yes? Perhaps there should be higher taxes on empty dwellings to motivate owners to sell / lower their asking rent.
I'm... technically a minority. I just don't have the mindset of victimhood that liberals tell me I should have.
With that said, we should cut the head off the snake, asset management firms like BlackRock (that's a whole other discussion in of itself).
Allow the market to run its course. Meaning if no one is buying these empty dwellings, naturally, the price of these empty dwellings should drop over time. If the owner is able to continue holding onto it and refuses to lower their price to attract more attention to sale, that's on the owner. Doesn't make sense to force their hand to sell it by increasing their taxes on a building that isn't even being utilized in the first place.
Same thought process for renting a dwelling. If the owner can afford for assets to not produce, then so be it. But anyone with a sound mind would definitely lower their rent prices to attract renters.
We have been allowing the market to run its course, we are living with the result: a limited quantity required for survival (shelter) is bought up for the purpose of profiting off that scarcity and requirement, and those that can't afford to maximize the landlord's profits are left on the streets.
When people do this with luxury items like concert tickets and consoles we vilify them and call them scalpers. When they do it with shelter it suddenly becomes "an investment" regardless of the harm it does to the general population.
I find it baffling how often I hear "things are bad right now with X, but we just need to continue doing the exact same way we have been and change nothing, and surely it will improve!"
Well I personally feel that BlackRock and other asset management firms are the problem. I don't support corporations buying up assets (homes in this case), manipulating the market, and attempting to flip for even more than its actually worth.
Okay, but that is a result of "letting the market run its course." What do you suggest be changed in order to stop BlackRock from doing that?
The End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act - introduced by Dems.
This is why I stay center (though I lean right of center), I'm able to to sway left and right on issues. As should everyone else.
See? Now that is a much better response to the article than a random tangent about immigrants. Actual ideas that could help the situation.
I do very much question your so-called commitment to "stay center" when your first response to an article about homelessness and vacant homes is "Biden and immigrants bad".