this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
745 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2605 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

To be clear, I'm planning to vote against trump unless somehow biden gets replaced with someone worse than trump (~0% chance that happens, but still)

that said, I don't know a single person who's happy with biden or excited that he's the candidate, and frankly I doubt the sanity of anyone excited about him as much as I doubt bidens sanity (whereas with people voting for trump the insanity is crystal clear). I don't know for sure who would be better, kamala might be the best bet, but being able to get through a debate without gibberish word salad sentences should be an obvious requirement

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It should be, but the time and place for it was in the primaries, not when you're up against another word salad candidate with a die hard rock solid base.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

lmao what primary? the one where there were zero serious alternatives because everyone even suggesting candidates were yelled at for hElPiNg tRuMp simply by contesting biden?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And? If you can't win a primary, there's no way you'll win a general election. The dudes going against Biden lost hugely.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

You didn't even read their comment before replying. This is a total non sequitur.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Isn't Kamala thoroughly disliked?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Less than Biden was, even before the debate, but only she gets described that way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised. So does she poll more favorably against Trump than Biden? Because if so then they should just pull the trigger on that one, this Biden shit is just one big oof.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mixed bag. She has in some polls, but worse in others. A little hard to compare Biden to anyone else, as he's the actual nominee and has both made his case and had real attacks against him.

No one's going to get a sure thing, but I just don't see how Biden gets through this. He's rolling the dice every time he's in public, his follow ups have been largely scripted and just highlighted his worst personality traits, and he's had a lot of credible voices say he's done. And all that on top of already losing before the debate. He needed the debate to turn that around. A status quo result would have been bad, let alone this shit show.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Checking out some videos of Biden's worst moments and I just feel bad. It's starting to feel like goddamn elder abuse to have him as the candidate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but not to the same level as biden for people who are on the fence between biden and trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I would've imagined he was much more disliked amongst fence sitters. Not just her policies but superficial reasons such as her being a black woman sure doesn't help. Being a woman alone might be too much for some of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The point is that is a fine viewpoint to have, but to loudly just bemoan problem rather than proposing the preferred alternative is hardly useful. It has all the downsides of undermining the still presumptive candidate without any concrete hint of building up an alternative.