this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
1209 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

5489 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is Lemmy, liberal = right-wing fascist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure it's more a distinction between people who focus on personal liberties and especially private property vs collectivism and socialism. Basically lots of people aren't for right wing fascism but still want to own private property, view their personal comforts more important than necessarily the needs of others (NIMBYs I think count here) etc.

This could be as simple as not liking property damage in protests, still preferring cars and trucks to public transportation, not liking high occupancy buildings in your area etc, at least that's how I've gleaned it as someone who doesn't use that kinda label myself.

I could be wrong, but that's how it feels to me. Closer to centrist or even just original form of libertarian, which some have labeled as being a bit more left wing than US libertarians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who decides what property damage to cause? If I disagree with someone can I smash their car windows?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I gave a deduced definition, not an endorsement. I will say that I view human rights and human life as more important than private property, but I am in no way encouraging people to harm or steal from someone they just don't like.

When someone asked me what I'd do about someone stealing an A/C unit off a house if I didn't have a gun, my answer was basically "I would not kill someone over an a/c unit." I stand by that statement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

yes. thank you for a more nuanced viewpoint. i'd have to agree with your assessment, even if i don't agree with the principle.

for me, living in a society requires being part of a collective (in the modern world). i prefer many of the things that the 'true libertarian' prefers, but i don't expect society to provide my selfish desires. that's why i choose rural over urban. but the suburbs are part of am urban landscape, so if someone wants to live that NIMBY life, that need to make sure their backyard is far away from the other backyards. i realize that is getting harder and harder to do, which is why i dream of a secular society where we can practice a humanitarian from of birth control, because ultimately, a healthy life just isn't possible when we are crowded into tight spaces. humans need room to breathe and express themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

It's like words don't have meaning anymore..