Free and Open Source Software

17957 readers

141 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

133

Ladybird web browser now funded by GitHub co-founder, promises ‘no code’ from rivals (devclass.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That could also mean client API-compatible, so Lemmy apps would work with it, which doesn't address federation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe so. We should, probably, ask @[email protected] about this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Pong. @[email protected] , in sublinks, the federation services are entirely separate from the API of the instance. So much separate, the federation services are written in a programming language called Golang. The API service is written in a programming language called Java.

One aspect does not require or preclude the other with Sublinks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Indeed, protocol is independent from implementation language, but that isn't the question at hand.

Do you know whether Beehaw will still federate with the lemmyverse (and therefore the rest of us) after moving to Sublinks?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

The current aim of Sublinks is Lemmy parity for V1 release. So yes, I do see Beehaw still federating with Lemmy instances at the on-set.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Thanks for clearing that up!