this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
147 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2236 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Define "massive." Because if it doesn't substantially cut into their profits then it's not a fine but just the cost of doing business.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"In case a gatekeeper does not comply with the obligations laid out in the DMA, the Commission can impose fines up to 10% of the company's total worldwide turnover, which can go up to 20% in case of repeated infringement."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The way fines should be constructed. As a percentage of something's worth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Meta's global revenue last year was $134 billion. It would have to be a historic fine to even make a dent. I'm not hopeful. This will be another "cost of doing business" situation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A $13 billion fine does not look like a "cost of doing business" scenario to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Imagine you making $100K last year doing some shady business. You got caught and convicted in federal court, your punishment is $10K fine, and that's it. You're free to change your tactics and make sure you don't get caught next time.

It's a little bit stink, but it's the best you could asked for.

13 billions to Meta may not be a slap on the wrist, but more like 5 spanks and 15 minutes timeout.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Imagine your "shady stuff" is not putting money into the parking meter because you are lazy. You get hit with a 10k fine. You then fix that and start putting money into the parking meter. Because ultimately it cost you less to fix it, than pay the fine. That's the language corporations understand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They haven't gotten that fine yet and $13 billion out of $134 billion is absolutely a "cost of doing business" fine. If they still make massive profits at the end of the year, they haven't been hurt.

Corporations have to be punished and they rarely are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, a million is cost of doing business. Once you get into single digit percentage fines, you're hurting them. Or do you expect shareholders to say, "ah, that's fine, that's just the EU, we're gonna hold Meta stock because we like them"?

Another thing to consider is that it's also about how many of those fines can the company absorb. Fine them a million? They can take a thousand of those before it even starts making a dent. But how many of the 1% fines can they take? 5? 10? 20?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Why would you want that? Do you seriously want to bankrupt a company for a single mistake? Not sure that's the world I want to live in. Once this cat's out of the bag, it's hard to put back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I agree, they haven’t got that fine, never mind actually paid it. But it would be about a third of their profits, not exactly negligible, and it could double for repeated offences.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh you'll see. It'll be super massive. It'll be amazingly punishing!

It'll be like... 0.2% of their gross.

Then it'll spend years in legal battles to become 0.05%.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Have you seen the kind of fines the EU hands out? They're nothing to sneeze at