this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
207 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
2864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
207
Tesla Full Self Driving Is Now 'End-To-End AI' (odysee.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm convinced that the self-driving AI from competent companies is better than human drivers already. The bar isn't perfection, the bar is the average driver, and the average driver is bad.

Having said that, I'd never get in a car with Tesla's self-driving solution. Musk polluted the term "full self-driving" to cars that definitely weren't.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No, the bar is accountability. If the FSD screws up either:

  1. It's claimed the driver was responsible, in which case it's absolutely not FSD
  2. Someone other than the driver is investigated and cleared/convicted of wrong doing.

It absolutely does not matter that it's better than an "average" driver. If the best driver in the world screws up, they are still held accountable.