this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)

196

16459 readers
33 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I saw it. That implies that spraying cornstarch won’t change anything. Think about it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

THEN WHAT FUCKING WILL CHANGE ANYTHING

Because this is the only thing that gets people like you to even talk about this.

edit: I want to be clear that I don't care if it's rude or uncivil to talk to people about this like this, I will do it again and again and again and I support efforts to be annoying about it, because at this point it's all we have left to maybe, potentially, get enough people angry enough that someone, somewhere does something. Anything

You're all making your frowny faces and saying "This is counter-productive" and you're simply not getting it.

If through some magical means we were to learn that nuking Manhattan would somehow lower global temperatures, then we would need to do that, just up and vaporize 1.6 million people. It would STILL be the ethically superior action to take if it magically worked. Because in the next century billions of people may die.

If we learned that filling the Grand Canyon with concrete would get companies to stop producing carbon waste and get people to accept inconveniences like electric cars and paper straws without whinging like a wounded toddler, then yes, line up those cement mixers.

When it comes to the trolly problem, you're all not even looking at the right tracks if you're so upset about incivility or annoyances when it comes to climate activism. If anyone is left to do it, one day they will erect statues of these kids throwing soup at paintings and coloring rocks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

This is such a clarifying post.

It's not about being useful, it's about feeling useful. It's about the impotent frustration of feeling you're not having an impact being channeled through a media stunt whether or not it in fact changes anything, or even if it makes things worse.

That is what's going on here, I think. Strategic thinking about this is slow and involves a long road and political concessions and compromises and getting involved hands-on with very out-of-sight things for a long time. This takes a second and it makes it to the news, so it feels like something got done, even if it wasn't the case.

And that's 21st century activism in a nutshell, basically.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

You need to learn to become compelling if you want to be heard. Annoying people will get you ignored, and likely discredited.

Also, you know nothing about me.

https://lemmy.world/comment/10754742

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not clicking, not looking, this isn't even about you, this is bigger than you. Every individual needs to get a lot better about getting their head out of their own ass.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You wrote “people like you” referring to me. Consider this lesson one in becoming compelling: know your audience.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, people like you, who have all the power to say something supportive of those doing anything, no matter how feeble, and instead employ people's worse emotions against something you find annoying. I stand by it. I don't care who you are or what your ideals are, you made a choice here to push back on people who are trying to save our lives. If you don't like the methodology, fine. Who cares. All you do by ranting about it is give ammunition to those who would still deny there is even a problem, as we all slowly boil to death.

At least the rocks will be clean, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

This comment is beautiful. It manages to admonish another for a concept it in of itself can not grasp.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I dunno, I'm hearing the person quite well. Probably because tone policing ain't my thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know this is nitpicking but.. I'd say the biggest issue with electric car now is the pricing. What do you think poor people should do?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We should ride bicycles and public transit, and the government should be investing in rail and walkability for us

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Exactly what I thought, we need less cars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh your a spineless defeatists! Anyways...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

And you're someone with poor spelling and reading comprehension.

It's you're, not your.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Its a poor indication of your position when you mock the delivery instead of the message.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mocked his position and delivery actually because I said he also has poor reading comprehension. I read their entire chain of comments before replying, and it was evident @[email protected] was having issues reading and understanding the messages @[email protected] was sending.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Your elitism is showing. You obviously understood what I said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It's you're, not your.

Oh thank God, OPs message was completely indecipherable until you translated it for us! /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Go back to reddit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That’s the implication of the meme.

I think there are better ways to bring attention to the concerns of climate change than defacing Stonehenge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The implication of the meme is that the people talking about how stupid the protests are are actually blind to the very real climate change happening. They might know about it, but they don't really comprehend that defacing the Stonehenge is nothing compared to it being completely underwater, alongside the whole area.

Whether the comic is right or wrong is another thing, and the other guy arguing in bad faith is a cunt, but I strongly believe that's what the comic is meant to portray.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm sure you were against the BLM protests as well. Begone liberal 👋

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It’s really cool how you decide the opinions and stance of others based on your own opinions. I’m sure you’re always right too.

I protested with BLM in Yonkers in June of 2020, but I’m sure you’re usually 100% correct otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I think the wider point is that people will remain ignorant, even when they've irrefutably been proven wrong.