this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
264 points (97.8% liked)

News

23259 readers
2796 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I agree with the first part. It was supposed to be a check and balance to government power and oppression. It gives people the power to fight back against injustice.

However, in the time of intercontinental missiles, planes, tanks, and remote operated drones, are a bunch of peasants with guns actually going to do anything if the government turned on its people? Does the "right to bear arms" not extend to other, non-gun weapons?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, you're bringing guns to an unmanned drone fight.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Guns would at least cause some difficulty oppressing people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

/looks around - That doesn't seem to be the case. A.I. has a better chance of repositioning the social locus of control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gun owners are literally the most cowardly people on the planet

Yous are scared of your own fucking shadows

"Whatcha scared of, coward?" "Uh, just other cowards is all" 😂

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't own a gun. I'm from a country where it's not an option. To assume makes an ASS out of u and me.

Your point is bullshit. Not all people are good. Rapists exist. Serial killers exist. I'd like some options if I ever ran into one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Imagine a world in which men could not own guns...

But women and intersex persons were given as many guns as they wanted for free.

What would it be like?

Probably better.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

yes, only people with the luxury of owning guns could not understand the terror of being unarmed

just because conservatives fight for a right doesn't mean it's bad. this is the 1 thing conservatives are right about

the problem is liberals don't take this as opportunity to promote more female gun ownership and tactical training. a society of armed women is a society of women who will learn math and possess their own bodies

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If ever there was a case for "more guns = more freedom", right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Taliban or not, the peasants made it impossible for both Russia and the US to hold for any period of time using a pretty ancient rifle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the IEDs, suicide bombers, and RPGs made a bigger difference in both cases

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, of course it wasn't just the rifle. But my point was that low-tech armaments (and terrain to an extent) didn't make it a walk in the park no matter how high-tech your military. You still have to hold it.