this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
189 points (90.9% liked)
Technology
59378 readers
2838 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was curious about the "technology" they used since the article didn't talk about it and I didn't want to listen to a podcast.
Having more drivers and smaller vehicles can get past a lot of the commercial drivers license requirements. Passenger endorsements are for 16 people or more.
It's so strange though. People are forgetting why we have busses in the first place. Economies of scale, more efficient, fewer emissions, less traffic, etc.
Safer, too. You generally don't want smaller buses that anyone can drive without a CDL. You want the big, honkin yellow bois, that are some of the safest vehicles on the road, party because of their size and weight.
Also, and this was a problem in the roll out: more drivers means more need for substitutes to fill in when they call off. They had drivers just not show up for various reasons, and the kids were stuck.
No one is forgetting. This is another idiotic startup with a solution in search of a problem. And one district got suckered into it. Most districts wouldn't dream of adopting something as idiotic as this, and if they did, parents would revolt.
Also big yellow school buses have an amazingly good safety record.