Technology

59322 readers

5220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1102

CEO of Google Says It Has No Solution for Its AI Providing Wildly Incorrect Information (futurism.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

444 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You know how Google's new feature called AI Overviews is prone to spitting out wildly incorrect answers to search queries? In one instance, AI Overviews told a user to use glue on pizza to make sure the cheese won't slide off (pssst...please don't do this.)

Well, according to an interview at The Vergewith Google CEO Sundar Pichai published earlier this week, just before criticism of the outputs really took off, these "hallucinations" are an "inherent feature" of AI large language models (LLM), which is what drives AI Overviews, and this feature "is still an unsolved problem."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Does it need to be real intelligence in order to have a conversation with it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Does it need to be real intelligence in order to have a conversation with it?

Behold, AI!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nobody has said that an LLM is real artificial intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I love how much you're walking back your own statements. Lmao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You just inflated my initial statement by assuming I meant that Chatgpt is smarter than humans. I said that Chatgpt is more advanced than the average human at linguistics, and I stand by it. Show me where I said "Chatgpt is smarter than a human" or "this is real simulated human intelligence". You just wanted to be angry at someone so you made your narrative in your mind.

I even said that it doesn't need to be real intelligence in order to be capable of having a conversation.

You'll probably keep creating your imaginary narrative, so there's no point in arguing with you.

Good bye.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You, sir, are an idiot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't care what you think, your attitude is disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Attitude doesn't have anything to do with fact.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Personal attacks and insults, what a disgusting person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Facts are not personal attacks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What fact?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, now you can't read too? Ok.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

You haven't said a single fact. All you do is assume things and insult people who don't agree with you.