this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1011 points (95.3% liked)

Antiwork

8259 readers
23 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

If everyone here, as they claim, is not against work, then why call it anti work? Why not call it anti labour exploitation?

For all the claims made in this post, I see a hundred saying that wage labor is the same as slavery, so this is a bit hard to believe

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

As someone who is legitimately anti-work I have a real problem with people who just want to change things. We're not getting FALGSC with "work reform" because then there's no reason to fully automate it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism" for those that want to save the time searching.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I just learned the term, but it sounds like the society from Star Trek but everyone is Sulu.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We're pretty far from being able to automate everything

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

And we'll stay that way as long as we think people should have jobs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which is why it's a goal not a demand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Thank you for getting it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FALGSC isn't going to happen overnight, and work reform is a realistic interim solution.

Arguing for lower hours and more pay to match the massive increases in productivity we've seen over the last 100 years is totally feasible. And a step in the right direction long term.

FALGSC is currently not feasible, and at this rate automation is only making the rich richer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

So much this, even if we saw automation replace millions of jobs tomorrow, it would take years for any meaningful shift to support those out of work. On the other hand, even some conservatives are interested in 32 hour work weeks. Baby steps are the most we can realistically hope for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When I dig my garden I am doing work. That obviously entails no wage labour let alone labour exploitation. Why is it hard to belive people might be against wage labour in its present form but not against fulfilling, self directed labour?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because getting food from your own garden is cute but absurdly unsustainable for 8 billion people in this world?

Like it or not, factories and large companies are the reason that 8 billion people can love on this planet. Granted, said companies can be quite abusive and a lot of rules are still in place allowing this abuse, but we're getting better at it, ymmv per country. Either way, abuse is not as bad today as it was 100 years ago or even 50 years ago. If automation and AI continue their current course, we'll all be working 2-3 day weeks soon as well.

Either way, I get the point, I'm just saying don't swing too far in the other direction either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just an example, take caring for my kids or decorating my house or even working out if you don't like that one. What do you mean by "the other direction"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry, I don't understand. You listed child care, and hobbies. What havr those to do with work?

The other direction being this antiwork thing which is highly unrealistic and in reality just a bunch of lazy guys complain about having to actually do work, like everyone else, thinking that somehow magically the world would be so much better if everyone dat on their fat ass

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

OK so you're just here to strawman and insult. Thanks for outing yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

No I said what my average experience here in this sub was, relating to the original post. Yeah, most people here quite literally simply don't want to work, and somehow think that goods and resources come into existence magically or something. So yes, I call them lazy because that's what they are.

If you want to have a serious discussion about work situations needing to improve I'm all for it. I just don't want to have another discussion about "my vegetable garden will sustain me, the entire world should do this"

Also, I quite literally did not understand what you wrote as you listed childcare and hobbies