this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
93 points (93.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43731 readers
1172 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I imagine there are many academics that won't budge from their current beliefs even when confronted with proof.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They might be academics, but definitely not scientists

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some scientists, might. There is no shortage on hubris in the scientific community.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I think we’re talking No True Scientist here

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Yup! I don’t understand the downvotes, because this absolutely happens. Especially when technology has progressed to enable us to answer certain questions that we couldn’t in the past. Old curmudgeonly academics can definitely be resistant to accepting that they’ve been wrong, even when confronted with proof. Sometimes the only way for old theories to die is for their proponents to die or retire. It’s a shame, but ego can be a massive problem in some disciplines.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some, sure. And they are indeed acting like flat earthers. I think they're likely to be the minority though and they're not acting like scientists if they do that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, it's just how I phrased the question. Sorry to be a Debbie downer but I was really interested in the answer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

No need to apologise mate, sorry if my answer came across as curt, wasn't intended that way :-)