Technology

59133 readers

2630 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

367

NetBSD bans all commits of AI-generated code (mastodon.sdf.org)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New development policy: code generated by a large language model or similar technology (e.g. ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot) is presumed to be tainted (i.e. of unclear copyright, not fitting NetBSD's licensing goals) and cannot be committed to NetBSD.

https://www.NetBSD.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lots of stupid people asking "how would they know?"

That's not the fucking point.

Okay, easy there, Chief. We were just trying to figure out how it worked. Sorry.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It was a fair question, but this is just going to turn out like universities failing or expelling people for alleged AI content in papers.

They can't prove it. They try to use AI tools to prove it, but those same tools will say a thesis paper from a decade ago is also AI generated. Pretty sure I saw a story of a professor accusing someone based off a tool having his own past paper fail the same tool

Short of an admission of guilt, it's a witch hunt.