646
UN votes to back Palestinian membership, prompting Israeli envoy to shred charter
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
646 points (98.8% liked)
World News
32297 readers
1052 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I really want to see this as the UN finally mending its ways, but seeing how they got Saudi Arabia for women’s rights chair and got caught denying doing anything for refugees in Thailand because “it would anger China”… I can’t help but see it as them playing to someone’s interest in creating chaos.
I don’t know who that would, what I know is trusting the UN’s motives isn’t a good bet lately.
I remember seeing a hot take that the political reason for this was because it removed SA’s “you’re just making up rules without our input” excuse when they got called out. Basically, by giving them the chair, it put a spotlight on their abuses and simultaneously removed any political excuses they had.
Meh. I’m fine with making rules without their input on any subject matter, and specially this one.
Do you know how Saudi Arabia was elected to that seat?
story time!
Saudi Arabia has a higher legal marriage age (18) ~~than many Western states~~. And that’s one thing of many that it does right for women.
Edit: it looks like most European states also have it at 18. It is only the some states in the USA that are doing it wrong.
It’s truly a beacon of equality and human rights upholding.
honestly, as good as this may be in the short term, they've really just added one more highly Conservative religious state that will vote against the interest of the common good moving forward.
I strongly support Palestine gaining statehood and for Israel to stop fucking with them (that extends far beyond the war), but that doesn't mean i like their ideals. i think there's a strong chance that this will cause problems moving forward and that conservatives will use that as ammunition.
that said, this is the un finally really kinda doing its job for once. ending global conflict through diplomacy. can't say that's a bad thing.
Just so you are aware, America is one of the most conservative members of the UN and constantly stop the UN from preventing or stopping genocides and other atrocities around the world.
oh I'm aware, that's why i said another.
The UN is more a place to talk with your enemies than with your friends, and getting the chance to sit at a table with people you disagree with rather than fighting each other is great.
If there are any Palestinians left to disagree with.
sure, but the issue of the un never getting things done or doing the wrong thing is due to the influence and stalling done by states that oppose the common good for religious reasons or personal gain. in the long run that's what Palestine is likely to be.
so again, i don't disagree with this move. it's necessary, but i also Foresee more problems in the future. nothing really for it, just a prediction.
Imagine thinking all Palestinians are hardened Islamists. Prejudice and ignorance much?
A Palestinian woman runs a brewery and beer festival in the town of Taybeh in the West Bank