Good. They should also do the bare minimum of sanctioning israel
Alsephina
"No quick wins" was in the original title of the article. SCMP often change their title within a few hours of releasing an article.
If you link the article as a post, that's still the title Lemmy automatically recommends.
China's already said they wouldn't retaliate with tariffs anymore, so I wonder what their response will be.
More export controls on rare earths, or maybe selling off US treasury bonds?
They're now saying these electronics will be tariffed separately lol. They're just doing blatant insider trading
Tradition? EU-China summits usually happen in person, with the covid years having been the exception. And the tensions with the US make this one particularly important perhaps.
Or they are saying that there isn’t likely to be much trade anyway with such high tariffs.
And they are saying. Further retaliations won't be through tariffs.
However, China warned that it will “resolutely counterattack and fight to the end” if the US continues to infringe on its rights and interests. It also said America should take full responsibility for the damage caused by the tariffs.
So I guess they will retaliate against any further tariffs as usual, but it will be through other means
What happens when Chinese companies suddenly have a oversupply of goods that would normally be shipped to the US?
They might — at least temporarily — decrease prices to sell those goods, and that would naturally mean more importers in the EU and other regions are gonna buy more of them and probably sell at lower prices, driving out local competitors
He folded pretty quick lmfao
Wonder how long it'll take for him to fold on China
Emulate classic games
not just supporting a country with human rights issues
I think it would be very tough for Canada to not support Canada though
Thanks, not sure why archive.today and .org couldn't load the article on my end