this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
596 points (94.9% liked)
Greentext
4342 readers
1045 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you're doing something illegal, and a lot of people know, it's a good policy to not get offside with people on a regular basis.
I mean the guy didn't even do anything to OP, we don't even know if he was aware his girl was cheating with him
While we're all playing morality police and talking about drugs, maybe keep in mind he stalked someguy being while he was obsessive and possessive of a woman.
Playing vigilante and involving the police because you got hurt fweewings is a dogshit move.
anyway everything on 4chan is fake, so this is just some incel fantasy about what he thinks would be cool.
It's pretty heavily implied he knew. Why else would he be angrier at the dealer than his ex?
Where is that implied
The fact that OP wanted revenge on him would imply he thought the drug dealer knew.
That’s just conjecture based on your interpretation.
And?
And it means nothing.
You see that right? Just because you have an interpretation doesn’t make it correct.
So? Neither does yours, you've got just as much evidence as me.
Sure, but we also have the consensus from this thread.
Which is more likely, you and however many upvotes you’ve had are correct, or the vastly more people here with the opposing view?
It's a consensus on Lemmy, which can have a strange view of things at times.
The fact that OP is a robot would imply that he is not mentally well and shouldn't be trusted
The fuck are you on about?
OP is a user of the 4chan board /r9k/, who go by the demonym "robot." They are moderately less brain damaged than /b/tards, but only barely so
I thought you were referring to the lack of causality in the original statement 😅
That's a stretch.
Why else would OP be more mad at the dealer than their ex then?
Pettiness.
I second this so hard
As a gay who used to be even pettier, I have hooked up with exboyfriends’ crushes and one exboyfriend’s new boyfriend. Good lord it is easy to get high off of petty revenge.
Who said more mad? Maybe OP didn't have evidence against the gf.
Correct, cuckolded men are well known to first ask their wife’s lover if they knew before attacking them. /s
Why are you taking this so personally? Lemmings get mad about the weirdest stuff.
I’m not taking this personally, don’t project. I’m just amazed how you stubbornly argue against one of the oldest story tropes of all time: the horned, vengeful husband/wife.
We're discussing whether greentext believes the dealer knew it was his GF, I'm not sure how your comment relates to that.
Amazing. I’m sorry if this was too complicated for you. Let me repeat:
There is no indication whatsoever that drug dealer guy knew. This has been explained to you a couple of times by other people.
In fact the glaring absence of any indication can be interpreted as: no, drug dealer did not know. This has also been explained.
You, on the other hand, claim the revenge taken out by Anon in itself is proof that he knew. Because a cuckold will never attack the lover unless the lover knew what they were doing.
That would be cool if it were so but it just isn’t. The trope of the cuckold attacking the lover is older than humanity itself. You’ll find stories even (or rather especially) in Greek mythology where cuckolding or just fancying the wrong person leads to eternal punishment. Also by the age of 20 most of us witnessed similar behavior a couple of times. If you didn’t good for you / grey out of the basement more.
You are doing the equivalent of arguing that 1+1 does not equal 2.
You're talking a lot, but not really providing any evidence beyond "it's obvious".
Why do you care so much about this?