Technology

70041 readers

25 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

499

Largest Farm to Grow Crops Under Solar Panels Proves To Be A Bumper Crop For Agrivoltaic Land Use (site.extension.uga.edu)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Largest Farm to Grow Crops Under Solar Panels Proves To Be A Bumper Crop For Agrivoltaic Land Use::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It works really well, so how is it a dodge? Is watering crops also a dodge?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's a dodge since the farm mentioned is historic farmland. They aren't allowed to stop farming and just put up solar.

When Kominek approached Boulder County regulators about putting up solar panels, they initially told him no, his land was designated as historic farmland.

In Kominek's case, he literally bet the farm in order to finance the roughly $2 million solar arrays.

"We had to put up our farm as collateral as well as the solar array as collateral to the bank," he says. "If this doesn't work, we lose the farm."

From: Original NPR story

If anything it seems like a clever way around zoning. Reading between the lines it seems they view the crops as kind of a bonus, not half the point like the original article makes it seem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You've got a really bizarre view of this, like you're really looking for an angle to discredit it.

Like, if your primary business is solar, and as a profitable side project you also produce food, what's the actual issue there?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry if I came out like I'm trying to discredit the idea, rather I was just trying to put more information out there - the linked article is fairly light on details.

Like, if your primary business is solar, and as a profitable side project you also produce food, what's the actual issue there?

There isn't one. But it's somewhat concerning that it was more viable for the owner to become a power plant than to run their farm as a farm.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That's thanks to food monopolies driving the prices farmers get down to barely sustainable levels