this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
98 points (99.0% liked)

News

22888 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New Yorkers who said they couldn’t approach the case fairly were excused during jury selection. But one of the women with the harshest assessments of him will be among those who will determine his fate on 34 counts of falsifying business records.

“I don’t like his persona, how he presents himself in public,” said the woman, who has lived in upper Manhattan for the last 15 years. The woman said she didn’t agree with some of Trump’s politics, which she called “outrageous.”

“He just seems very selfish and self-serving, so I don’t really appreciate that in any public servant,” she said, adding that while she doesn’t “know him as a person,” how he “portrays himself in public, it just seems to me it is not my cup of tea.”

Trump’s legal team took issue with her responses, but they were out of challenges by the time she was up for consideration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or they knew to temper their words lest they be dismissed. I imagine some want to be on the jury.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Only a complete idiot wants to be on this jury.

Ignoring that jury duty, in general, sucks from a monetary, social, and even mental health standpoint (probably a lot of others too that i just was too lazy to think through as I wrote an aside considerably longer than the sentence up until now): The identify of these jurors will get out and their lives will be hell.

The idea of John Cusack and Rachel Weiss manipulating lawyers so they can get justice by sneaking themselves onto a jury is very much fiction.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Are you kidding? I'd give up weeks, months of my time and income for the opportunity to actually ensure justice is upheld against that slippery snake. I'd still render a fair verdict on the actual evidence, but reality is heavily biased against him

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

He literally led a violent insurrection against the United States and, unless I missed one (there are a few...), has seen no legal repercussions from that.

And if he is still alive by the next time there is a republican in office? He'll walk free.

But hey. I am sure that this time will be all the difference and the identify of those jurors won't be leaked and they and their familes won't face violent retaliation from republican political organizations who experience no repercussions.

And, has been repeatedly demonstrated: Nobody will have your back. Or your family's back.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Cool thing about state level crimes is the president can’t pardon them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I can think of no better hill to die on. Too bad i won’t get the chance

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Standing up against fascists is too much for many people. And people wonder how the Reich ever took hold...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

I hate Trump too but even I can see that you're too biased to deliver justice.

As in, it's fine to say you'd give up your time to make sure he gets convicted. That outcome might even be "just".

It's not objective and impartial enough to be "justice" though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

YOU may not want to be on this jury, but having a jury of one's peers is a fundamental protection against tyranny. Inevitably some people recognize that and are willing to accept the risks of being on this particular jury to ensure due process is actually followed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I’d gladly serve on a jury just like I gladly pay my taxes and contribute to mutual aid. I want the results of people doing these things, so I’ll give more than I get because others need more than they can give

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is a juror allowed to write a book about their experience after the trial? If so, I bet at least one juror already has feelers out to find a publisher.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's happened before, yes. IIRC, one of the judges in another Trump case advised the jury to never reveal themselves, but outside of confidential information, they can't really control what they do after the trial.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would also assume that most publishers are treating this like a frigging demon core. Because it will instantly make the publisher the enemy of significant parts of the country (or world) and it will be parsed by lawyers(' legal assistants) with a fine tooth comb for ANYTHING that can be deemed libel.

People don't really understand that most of the right wing tell all bullshits are mostly just money laundering schemes. Nobody gives a fuck what eric trump snorted coke off of. But various republican "donors" gladly buy large quantities of that book to give money to other orgs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's the 101 level course on how to launder campaign money to an individual.