this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
373 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58155 readers
3752 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The aircraft flew up to speeds of 1,200mph. DARPA did not reveal which aircraft won the dogfight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Jets are far more powerful than humans are capable of controlling. Flight suits and training can only do so much to keep the pilot from blacking out.

Can they be piloted remotely? Or would that be too dangerous with latency

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes they can. Before AI the US was expecting to move to remote piloted jets

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Expecting to? We’ve been using remote piloted jets for twenty years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's not the case yet for fighters, just things like predator drones and global hawk

So really just surveillance and delivery of a couple of light air to surface missiles, most reported on for assassinations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You're better off with drones

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

What's the difference? A remotely or AI-piloted fighter jet is just a big drone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Drones are designed without cockpits. Retrofitting remote-control into an F-16 does not seem like the best choice to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Retrofitting F-16s to become drones (whether rc or ai-controlled) as well as designing a variant ditching human support for weight and monetary gains is the rational choice as long as non stealth aircraft are viable. In that case you'd stick to F-35s.

It makes no sense to waste billions worth of perfectly capable and proven airframes, engines and avionics. Any future drone that will have at least the same level of capabilities as an f-16 will cost practically cost the same. At the cost of high performance aircraft life support does not add that much cost to a plane, pilot costs (and availability) are a much bigger issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The only thing that makes it bigger is the cockpit. There’s no difference.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But can a drone fly like an F-16?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

If an f16 is remote controlled, it's technically a drone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Latency, signal interference, and limited human intelligence are all limiting factors in that strategy.

If the enemy interferes with any of those, the enemy wins.

This was is already being fought with autonomous drones. By the end of it, the robots will be unrecognizable to us now.