this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
805 points (89.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
506 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    805
    me🦊irl (pawb.social)
    submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
    187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    But the likelihood of them coordinating a meme based offensive against the, is it 4% now?

    But we're seeing an uptick recently like we haven't seen before, as it seems like the momentum is on the Linux side right now.

    Also a standard good policy is to 'kill the baby in the crib', especially so when there seems to be more dissatisfaction with Windows 11 these recent days.

    A potent combination of situations.

    And finally, there's nothing wrong (from a CEOs point of view) with just 'beating down' your competition every day of the week, regardless of their current market share, especially when it's easy to do so.

    I am sure that you could turn this into me being hired by Microsoft to defend their agenda

    Honestly? The thought has come to my mind, that you're actually an AI bot, part of the process to protect the current redirection of the narrative. Not hired by Microsoft per se, but a bot used by the company that any OS company would hire to shape the narrative.

    And the fact that you brought it up first preemptively, and the way you use your verbiage, adds to the suspicion.

    but in the end, the most plaussible explanation is usually the true one

    You're assuming yours is the most plausible explanation.

    You keep dismissing the ease of use of using AI bots in today's environment to redirect the narrative, and how often we're seeing it done across all Internet-based media today.

    There's companies out there that actually sell these services to corporations, and profit from doing so. Profit is always a strong motive generator.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I won't even try to convince you of the opposite or that i'm human. I even occasionally fail capcha tests so who knows!?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I won’t even try to convince you of the opposite or that i’m human. I even occasionally fail capcha tests so who knows!?

    So you 'say'.

    Honestly, I don't care either way if the sources are biological or electrical.

    My concern is the message itself and the redirecting the narrative negatively away from good products/services, and not if it's a human or bot that's doing it.

    My only point in mentioning bots is that they're very inexpensive to be used constantly (versus human beings), and are widely being used today.