this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
203 points (97.2% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

8756 readers
1 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sounds like trouble for Newpipe, Sponsorblock, etc...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


YouTube is bringing its ad blocker fight to mobile.

In an update on Monday, YouTube writes that users accessing videos through a third-party ad blocking app may encounter buffering issues or see an error message that reads, “The following content is not available on this app.”

It also began disabling videos for users with an ad blocking extension enabled.

But now, YouTube says its policies don’t allow “third-party apps to turn off ads because that prevents the creator from being rewarded for viewership.” This appears to target mobile ad blockers like AdGuard, which lets you open YouTube within the ad blocking app, where you’ll get to view videos interruption-free.

“When we find an app that violates these terms, we will take appropriate action to protect our platform, creators, and viewers.”

This likely won’t come as pleasant news to all the users who watch YouTube through ad blocking apps, but it doesn’t look like YouTube is backing down in its battle against ad blockers anytime soon.


The original article contains 220 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 25%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Folks, Just read the extra 55 words in the article. Most of you wont spend a dime on journalism of any kind, at least fully read the articles your interested in.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And give “the verge” some ad revenue? Or potentially have their trackers on my phone/computer? Nah I’m good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My bad i assumed people on this sub had the amateur knowledge required to protect themselves and/or avoid the 5 trackers on the site.

Your right though, if clicking a link to theverge is such a massive risk for you, then not reading articles is probably least of your concerns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

And give “the verge” some ad revenue?

Wait you don't have an ad blocker ? (to be fair I use an adblocker which does pretend to watch and click ads thus giving the verge ad revenue)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Last year, YouTube “launched a global effort” to encourage users to allow ads while watching videos or upgrade to YouTube Premium. It also began disabling videos for users with an ad blocking extension enabled.

“We only allow third-party apps to use our API when they follow our API Services Terms of Service,” YouTube says.

To get around this, YouTube once again suggests signing up for the ad-free YouTube Premium.

Not much gained tbh

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

i chose to read the 41 words of your comment instead 😌

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

This bot is saving me from having to open the "article", try to decipher SEO bullshit modern journalism just to find shitpost like this, eat some ads, and unavoidable (at least on mobile) trackers, js, etc. Also personally hate link posts, i wish people put this kind of summaries in the actual post.

Just ignore/block the bot and move on.