this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
474 points (98.6% liked)

memes

9683 readers
3356 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm repeating myself here but I hate it when people say "Just use X. It's better." and then omit explaining why it's better. Give us a reason to consider changing or say nothing at all

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fair enough. 7z offers basically the same functionality as winRar including windows shell extensions (right click -> extract here, etc). It has slightly better compression ratios than WinRAR, and it’s open source. It doesn’t nag you to register.

It also supports an insane number of file formats. It will extract files from every pretty much every obscure archive you can think of (.ace, .cab) and all kinds of file types you wouldn’t expect like self-extracting executables, isos, .msi installers, vmdks, and more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Actually, if you are using 7zip on windows 11, consider giving nanazip a try. It is 7zip but it adds the shortcuts to the new(and debatably worse) right click context menu on windows 11.

And don't quote me on this but I remember having seen somewhere that the devs of 7zip says they won't update 7zip to use the new context menu.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Or just bring back the windows 10 context menu

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds cool. I'm still just using the unzipper that's built in windows explorer. I don't see why it's inadequate.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago

Give us a reason to consider changing

Because it's better lol