this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
563 points (99.5% liked)

World News

32282 readers
600 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My employer gets around it by refusing to hire anyone in Colorado for remote jobs. Guess the same will happen for New York.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I feel like a business would have to be really dumb to rule out hiring NY'ers because of this. NY has a very educated and very large population.

Edit: I did the math. Colorado and NY have a combined college degree population of 9.9 million, or 8.9% of US degree holders.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a business would have to be really dumb

I don’t see how this is a counterargument.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Lmao you got me there.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I can get maybe blocking one state but New York AND Colorado? I'm sure California or some other larger, more progressive state will eventually make the swap too. Eventually you start cutting yourself off from not just large swaths of the american workforce, but also disproportionately from the types of hires you need (assuming remote hires still).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to the article, California already has a similar law. I didn't dig into the details of it. Relevant bit:

A similar pay transparency ordinance has been in effect in New York City since 2022. Now, the rest of the state joins a handful of others with similar laws, including California and Colorado.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I had a feeling CA had something similar but couldn't recall and couldn't be bothered to google in the moment on my phone lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It is required for employers here in Washington. But if the company is headquartered in a state where it is not required, they do not have to list it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think one long term effect of this would be driving up wages outside of states that require posted salaries, at least for some positions in some industries. There probably aren't enough businesses signing on to this idea to make much of a dent though. As a business, you're effectively reducing your own labor pool. Either way it feels like the corporate equivalent of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Probably the same idiots whining that "no one wants to work anymore" (cue worlds tiniest violin).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They'll be out of states if we keep going then they'll naturally just cease to exist. Or, more likely, adapt to actual regulations.