Asklemmy

43907 readers

1355 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

179

What is an interesting fact that you recently discovered? (pawb.social)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

219 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

And you tell other Americans this and they think you're rude. "No, you need to merge as soon as you can, that's rude to drive all the way to the end!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If traffic is free flowing and an opportunity presents itself then it’s still better to merge earlier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's not the discussion.
Why/How is it better? If traffic is flowing and there is space to be literally NOT disruptive to flow, then it doesn't make a difference where you merge.

I'll bet though that when you merge, it is actually slightly disrupting flow as the person behind backs off, and then everyone else slightly adjusts. Now multiply this by more cars merging wherever they damn well feel like? If traffic is flowing and enough gaps exist so nobody has to adjust at all, then the merging literally doesn't matter and it's not the same argument.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because as the lane is ending, the entire distance from wherever you are to wherever the lane ends is an opportunity to merge without disturbing other traffic. When the lane ends, that moment is now forced, leading to a higher likelihood of the driver(s) behind having to brake more abruptly and/or to an even lower speed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Both drivers knew the merge end was coming. Unless they're morons. People are morons. That's why this is an argument.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Exactly... Now I'm armed with some data. I look forward to the next interaction.