this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
41 points (72.5% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2100 readers
62 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

just watched dune part two, and i gotta tell ya, after being blown away by the scope and promise of dune part one, part two seemed a rushed and jumbled mess to me.

i know i'm in the vast minority on this, but part two of course, could have, and should have been expanded into at least two or three separate movies to do the story justice. the majesty of the first movie was mashed into a frenetic eye rolling dash to the finish with nothing happening that should have hit me, with the same tingles up my spine, as when i read it all those decades ago. not one scene or event made me feel anything.

but wait a second did them just defeat the entire galactic empire in the span of 90 seconds. boy that was convenient huh. blech,

i did not like it at all. imma rewatch at 2160 when i can, and maybe come back to edit, but i kept waiting for the cool shyt to start, and they blew on past all the cool shyt for 2 hrs and 45 minutes.

the whole thing was nothin but a dust storm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Others have answered partially his purpose, but the Baron's plan was for Raban to exploit and crush Arrakis as much as possible to recover the funds spent on the invasion, then the na-Baron comes in as a benevolent saviour for the people. The Harkonnens get a bunch of money, control of the spice, and a cushy job for the Baron's favourite

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How would a complete psychopath who has been waging war against a people come in as its savior? That doesn't make sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

It's different in the books shrug

I think the first time Feud-Rautha comes to Arrakis in the book is with the emperor and Baron and those guys right at the end. No-one on the planet knows of him yet

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Interesting, I feel that didn't come through in the movie at all. Also, didn't the Harkonnens already have control of the spice after the betrayal in Part One?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, I don't think it was in the film at all either. The Harkonnens do have control one again by the end of part one but they are feared and hated. The plan was to play on this reputation with "The Beast" Raban whilst making as much money as possible. After a few years, the population are "liberated" by Feud-Rautha who will be a much kinder ruler and so the people will love him. Of course, they will still be under Harkonnen rule and still giving them spice and money, but probably too stupid or relieved to notice this. (part of the motif of the media is that Harkonnens rule through fear and don't really understand people very well, in the way that the Atredies do)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah cool, that makes a lot of sense now. Without going into all that detail however, I agree with the original comment that they shouldn't have spent so much time introducing Feyd-Rautha, or should have introduced him in the first movie. As is, it was a lot of screentime that never pays off, except for being cool looking I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I mean he impregnated a witch. I think thats going to be significant later.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

While a serviceable film, part two was a much looser interpretation of the book. If you're interested I'd highly recommend reading it.