this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
278 points (93.4% liked)
Technology
59378 readers
2618 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No need for fighting friend. Just conversation.
You mentioned LG and HTC. There's a reason HTC doesn't exist anymore and why LG has cut back significantly on manufacturing. Neither brand is known for quality products in this segment. They fell from grace pretty quickly. None of the major US cell providers offer LG devices for sale. The Samsung S3 and S4 are decade old phones and the battery issue mentioned was when the technology was changing. Fast and adaptive charging was taking off. There are always hiccups for any emerging tech. These points you made here don't really sway the argument. You're simply mentioning bad products or bad product design. Which is something Apple is just as guilty of looking back.
Chromebooks were designed as cheap planned obsolescence to fit a specific market segment. That's why they initially received short support lifespans. The average consumer owns a laptop for just four years before upgrading. Can't complain when the product is made with cheap parts to make the price cheap. They know it's gonna be replaced. After several years of push back, Google upped it to 10 years. Unsurprisingly expensive Chromebooks hit the market. There are models out there with $2000-$3000 price tags.
A business that does what it does to make money. They do what they can to make the most money in the long term. Take a look at any second hand market service and notice the abundance of Apple products. People upgrade often so it doesn't matter how long the device lasts. Society's desire for new and better is the real problem here. It's our fault we have such a high ewaste problem. We facilitated these companies to get away with it. No matter who you point the finger at, they're all the same. They're all bad and produce a lot of ewaste. Contributing to the pile in different and/or similar ways.
Which brings home the point. If Apple really goes through this much effort of supporting their devices for 8 to 10 years with software updates, why release a new one every year? Why not make them easily repairable? They don't want you to so we buy new ones because we've allowed them to build their business on this cycle.