this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
1168 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

9297 readers
2055 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Depends on the kind of blur. Some kinds can indeed be almost perfectly removed if you know the used blurring function, others are destructive. But, yes, don't take that chance. Always delete/paint over sensitive information.

Source: we had to do just that in a course I took a long time ago.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer sampling the surroundings, typing out a different number or text over it, then blurring with a non destructive effect.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Name: Phil McCracken

SSN: EAT-MY-NUTS

Just for anyone who tries

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Signature: ...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wouldn't you also need to know in what kind of pattern the blur was applied. I am sure if you do it multiple times starting from multiple non identical partitioning of the region, it will be impossible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You're severely underestimating the power of weaponized autism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah man, I remember when they caught some pedo creep who used a non-destructive blur on the CSAM materials he produced that included his face. So satisfying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

He only spiral blurred his face... So they just did it in the opposite direction. It was beyond stupid

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Always paint over sensitive information.

Not in PDF tho. There, the stroke is saved in metadata..