Technology

58142 readers

4753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

233

Toyota wants hydrogen to succeed so bad it’s paying people to buy the Mirai (techcrunch.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Toyota wants hydrogen to succeed so bad it’s paying people to buy the Mirai::Toyota is offering some amazing deals for its hydrogen fuel cell-powered Mirai. That is, if customers can find the hydrogen to power it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Hydrogen cannot be greener than an EV, because it's just an EV with more steps. It's energy intensive to turn electricity + water to hydrogen, transport it, pump it, then convert it back to electricity.

The losses from simply running electrons through a wire are very small.

It is physically impossible for hydrogen cars to ever be as green as EVs. In order to do so you'd have to break laws of physics.

E: ok people. You live in your little fantasy world where thermodynamics aren't a thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is physically impossible for hydrogen cars to ever be as green as EVs. In order to do so you’d have to break laws of physics.

In a pure fuel comparison sure, does that still hold true when you also factor in manufacturing?

The losses from simply running electrons through a wire are very small.

You conveniently forgot about battery charging and discharging losses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

In a pure fuel comparison sure, does that still hold true when you also factor in manufacturing?

Yes.

You conveniently forgot about battery charging and discharging losses.

I didn't. Those are very small. Compared to the losses of a HFCEV or even worse, a combustion hydrogen car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

There are laws of thermodynamics and there are laws of kinetics.

Fuels have much more power density than batteries. You can't deliver power as fast with a battery compared to a fuel. It doesn't matter if thermodynamically one is more efficient or greener than the other. You would be crazy to suggest moving an airbus with a battery, that's physically impossible.

I'm a researcher in both fields (batteries and hydrogen)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Sure, but I'm not talking about jets, which yeah, do need a far greater energy density than batteries can currently provide.