this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
473 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59030 readers
3030 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

If the AI generated content is labeled, or has context, or has comments or descriptions created by people, then wouldn't it just be the same as synthetic training data? Which is shown to still be very useful for training.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Most AI-generated data in the wild won't have labels because there's no incentive to label it, and in a lot of cases there are incentives to not label it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Yes it's still useful and it's basically how we made our last couple of jumps. An AI training on AI generated data being graded by another AI. We've hit diminishing returns though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Exactly what percentage of AI data in the wild is labeled?

Close to zero I'd say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Sorta. This "model collapse" thing is basically an urban legend at this point.

The kernel of truth is this: A model learns stuff. When you use that model to generate training data, it will not output all it has learned. The second generation model will not know as much as the first. If you repeat this process a couple times, you are left with nothing. It's hard to see how this could become a problem in the real world.

Incest is a good analogy, if you know what the problem with inbreeding is: You lose genetic diversity. Still, breeders use this to get to desired traits and so does nature (genetic bottleneck, founder effect).