this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
105 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

59398 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
105
Why widespread tech layoffs keep happening despite a strong U.S. economy (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Why widespread tech layoffs keep happening despite a strong U.S. economy::The number of tech sector layoffs in 2024 has been outpacing the number of terminations in 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say what my source was. The fact that you think it was "the fed" or the head of any bank tells me that you have no idea how any of this actually works.

I'm talking about real numbers and what I see day to day.

You have a nice day now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

c/iamverysmart comment right there fam

Who do you think publishes the data you are calling "real numbers"?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

This guy posts waaaay too much around here. Practically all he does is argue his ignorant opinions. I've considered blocking him, but sometimes he writes something so unbelievably dumb that it makes me laugh

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're welcome!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Not you, the guy you were replying to. I can see why you might have thought I meant you by the way I wrote that. Should have been more clear. My bad

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Hahahaha all good, thanks for clarifying