this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
721 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
3575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

France uncovers a vast Russian disinformation campaign in Europe::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

In English, you'd just describe that as "objective" and "subjective". This isn't in any way uniquely Russian. But its nice to pretend it is, because it plays well with the process of demonization.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

True versus verified, perhaps

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I can do that in Russian too. I can't do the former in English.

There are plenty of things possible in one language and not (yet\anymore) in another. I don't see what does this have to do with any kind of demonization. Maybe for people knowing only one language, which, yes, is more common for English speakers than I'd like to think.

I suppose a speaker of Finnish would have something to enlighten us about some languages being in some regards inferior to his own, too. Or a speaker of Icelandic. Or maybe even Persian. There are languages having dozens of words to distinguish shades\textures of snow or sand, or not having future tense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of things possible in one language and not (yet\anymore) in another. I don’t see what does this have to do with any kind of demonization.

Pick a differential, declare that it is a unique good/bad indicator, and then work it into your propaganda. "In Chinese, the word for tragedy is the same as the word for opportunity" to imply Asian businessmen are naturally predatory. The "red heads have no souls" meme, used to denigrate the Irish. The entire field of Phrenology is based on picking differentials and trying to explain your way backwards into why it proves some racist theory.

Its a boilerplate technique for alienating, mystifying, and ultimately demonizing an outside group.,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This whole chain of thought may make sense to you if you don't speak any other languages that English.

It just never in the world would weigh more for me than the joy of noticing unique traits of any particular language\dialect I've been lucky to learn something about.

And as a Russian native speaker, I've given you an example which is factual in the very first my comment in this thread. What are you going to do, ignore the fact?

Or maybe it's just easier to find something to condemn in what others say when you yourself have nothing to say on subject because of being simply ignorant about other languages.