178
Europeans want decisive action against disinformation on the internet
(www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de)
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
178 points (96.4% liked)
Technology
59446 readers
3775 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So how exactly would you do it without room for abuse?
You don't. The "room for abuse" is exactly what disinformation peddlers want to have codified.
After all, with enough money, it'd be easy for bad actors to get their agents into "independent" information veracity panels.
The only way I can think of to reliably stop disinformation is to reduce or eliminate society's dependence on money. Otherwise, money will always talk, and everybody has their price.
Honestly, I think the truth is simpler. Humans are a very large group, and just by sheer numbers there will always be idiots and assholes. I consider them to be canaries. If theres idiots, if theres disagreements and arguments, then theres valuable discussion to be had.
Find ways to minimize the time & energy that you and others around you spend on rewarding idiots and assholes for being such.
I think they might also mean "room for abuse" as in people abusing said guidelines to attack people or subjects they don't like though erroneous reporting and poor enforcement of those guidelines (you already see it happen with something like community notes), abuse can go both ways with something like this.
You also highlight an important point in that people who create the disinformation already know how to get around barriers and telling them what is and isn't explicitly will just make their job easier, so in essence such rules and guidelines only hurt anyone else, the people who would be on the receiving end of abusive reporting, or abuse of the correction systems.