this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
430 points (83.1% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
3414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

No copyright law means whatever anyone comes up with can be massmanufactured cheaply by a big corp.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A. Confusing this with patents

B. They already can. Copyrights don't protect individual artists they protect big corps.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

this is some terminally online take

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Personal attacks won't change the argument. It just shows that you don't have one.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

"personal attack won't change the fact that I have shit for brains and you don't."

you do you, mr. shit-for-brains

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Sorry my bad I thought I blocked every Disney agent on this site. Don't worry I will take care of that now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That's patents

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Non-exclusively, so if something works everyone will make it and get a piece of the pie.

I see no problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, IMO trademarks are important and should be protected. And publishing full works should have royalties go to the original producer, and this is a case where I think for the lifetime of the artist is fair. Though I do think that the royalties should have a formula rather than being entirely determined by the original producer (to prevent the price from essentially making it not available), though an exclusivity period would be fair, though with a duration of maybe a year or two.

With trademarks, canon can be established, as can standards like "cartoons with the Disney logo won't be porn".

If someone wants to make a series where Luke Skywalker and Jean Luc Picard fly around the galaxy settling Star Wars vs Star Trek debates by explaining Muppets are better than both and then order Darth Vader to massacre everyone that disagrees and the Borg to assimilate the rest, it doesn't harm the originals in any way. Unless it's so much better than no one cares about the originals anymore, but that's just the way competition works.