Technology

59424 readers

3747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

673

George Carlin Estate Files Lawsuit Against Group Behind AI-Generated Stand-Up Special: ‘A Casual Theft of a Great American Artist’s Work’ (variety.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

251 comments fedilink hide all child comments

George Carlin Estate Files Lawsuit Against Group Behind AI-Generated Stand-Up Special: ‘A Casual Theft of a Great American Artist’s Work’::George Carlin's estate has filed a lawsuit against the creators behind an AI-generated comedy special featuring a recreation of the comedian's voice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Is Alec Baldwin appearing on SNL as Donald Trp considered Satire?

How different is the end result as a from a human prompt guided AI creation, created by comedians that is mimicking any public persona at all?

As far as your understanding of the nuances, what is the specific reasoning and background providrd from the creators themselves on this?

Looks a lot like you, among many others, are just reacting with the anti AI pitchfork crowd and throwing mud at anyone that doesnt fall into the narrative bubble you prefer on this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Are you saying this is a satire specifically on the current AI world views, or that all satirical comedy specials are protected by the first amendment and can be made available in the same way this was?

How different is the end result

They are exactly the same and I would have the same opinion about someone mimicking George Catlins voice, recording a set and then uploading it to YouTube under his name.

My issue is more with the labeling than with the AI. I'm actually a huge AI advocate, it's also why I think we need to be responsible with it and hold those that aren't accountable.

These guys are looking for a quick buck and it's just giving fodder to those that don't want us to have free access to AI and it's outputs.

As for the lawsuit, ultimately I think the platform should be held responsible for not having better policies on clearly indicating when a video is an AI impersonation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Even the labelling itself in this case is part of the satire.

I'm saying satire falls under protected speech already, period. Your position requires it doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What is it a satire on? What is the object of the satire?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

My position is that it doesn't need the protection, it's perfectly fine to make AI generated content as long as it's labeled as such and there is no chance of mistaking it for the original person.

I get your argument, I just think it implies everything else wouldn't be legal. Like only comedy specials about AI are okay.