this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
385 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
2726 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Netflix is turning into cable TV::After the loss of behind-the-scenes talent and the acquisition of rights to WWE, Netflix is starting to feel more and more like basic cable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

WWE? Lol they think that's must have TV?

5 billion for ten years? Lolol. Oh my sides. It's not even an acquisition. It's 500 million a year for fake wrestling.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago (3 children)

fake wrestling

Nitpicking, but it's meant to be entertainment. You don't call HBO shows fake drama.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's one of the reasons wrestling fans prefer the term scripted or staged as opposed to fake. It still requires tons of athleticism, and lots of wrestlers are still taking very real hits and injuries despite trying to minimize the impacts of them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Pro wrestling has always been theater's weird cousin from the other side of the tracks. They're more alike than fans of either are willing to admit.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do the people who go "you know that stuffs fake right?" actually think that there are people who think it's real?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The best response to that is to pretend like you are just discovering that for the first time.

Explain how you believed this entire time a man could summon fire with a wave of his hand, or even come back from the dead, and that they have ruined your worldview.

When you point out how stupid the question is, makes the conversation short.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Lol, I like the way you think.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Well I can't call it wrestling, because then what would we call wrestling.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Angry grab ass time

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

The same thing MMA calls it: catch wrestling.

They're all linked. They have an evolutionary track.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact: wrestling started off as a show before it became a sport.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Untrue. Vastly untrue.

What we know as wrestling started off in civil war camps (between battles, Irish soldiers would wrestle each other while the other soldiers would bet on the matches), which eventually turned into a legitimate sport, who's first World Champion was a man called William Muldoon. Also known as "the solid man".

What we know as professional wrestling today can be traced back to 1909 with a match between Frank Gotch and George Hackenschmidt, which is considered to be the last legitimate contest for a world title under the banner of "professional wrestling".

After that we get the rise of the Gold Dust Trio and what we know as "sports entertainment".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And it’s a pretty massive audience. This could officially be the end of Netflix as a movie powerhouse, but it isn’t a bad business strategy. Especially with how much they’re raking in from people paying for ads on top of the advertising dollars they’re earning from running them in the first place. They’re phasing out the cheapest ad free option. It’s a big gamble. And, honestly? Fuck ‘em if it doesn’t work. I mean, fuck ‘em if it does work too. I know I don’t personally give a shit about wrestling. (I don’t give a shit about their profits either. They’re not getting my booty. Yo-ho.)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, as shitty as it is, there's a decent sized market for it. Probably worth it to them to overpay so much for it to hurt the current streaming provider, Peacock.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

I think it's ignorant to call it "shitty" or "fake wrestling".

Pro-wrestling entertainment is a form of camp theater, like drag shows. It's an old, cherished artform with a wide, passionate audience that outsiders routinely dismiss because they don't get it.

I don't watch it. It doesn't appeal to me. But I know people who love it. I think it's largely class elitism that perpetuates the misconception that this form of performance art is somehow unrespectable. It's not, it's challenging, dangerous, physically demanding theater.

Edit: For those confused or skeptical, check out Super Eyepatch Wolf's captivating media analysis "The Undertaker: Long term story telling in wrestling"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Hella based take.

Attitude was the best era also

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Just like in nineteen ninety-eight when The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I would call WWE shitty because of what they do to their performers. The performers are artists and deserve our respect tho.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

You understand there are other people in the world besides yourself that have different interests than you, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You don't have to like it, but just FYI, the market doesn't care about your feelings. Professional wrestling is a worldwide phenomenon, especially in Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East.

The UFC merged with the WWE this year, and UFC fighters routinely show up to WWE events. Real professional fighters don't seem to care that it's scripted

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just because it's something you don't like, doesn't make it not worth an insane amount of money.

There's a reason why WWE is not only still around, but worth more today than it was in it's "heyday".

You're laughing because someone bought a proven market. It's literally the same as Marvel, Star Wars, or any other market.

That's nice you think you understand what a valuable acquisition is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I think you're applying your own viewpoint here to the general public.

I don't enjoy wrestling. I also don't enjoy reality TV, teen dramas, horror shows, or European Football. But that doesn't mean they don't have value.

If TV needs to provide some infallible, logical benefit to be worth something, then every show is in trouble. It's practically all made up stories about nothing that matters.

This is one of the narrow times that "the customer is always right" applies correctly. It doesn't matter if it's "good" by any one person's definition. If people watch, it has value.

I'd pay good money to see high quality Starcraft 2 tournaments on TV. I doubt many other people would. That's how value is determined.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/Yvd3aEsThbc?si=Zjmv2ww5Jnz_zrR8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.