this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
452 points (95.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26718 readers
4042 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Or you can just turn the "no guess" mode on like a regular human.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Also this isn't a 50/50 chance to lose. You can win by placing all the flags without clearing all safe squares. So you're guaranteed to win here by just flagging one, then the other if the first didn't do the trick.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure that is a normal win condition. Most places describe a win as being when all safe fields are cleared, not if the flags are placed correctly or at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh it isn't? I was sure it was, I used to play a lot of minesweeper. In some of those versions, you definitely didn't have to uncover all empty squares. The goal was just to uncover enough information to tell the game where the mines are. But if that's not a universal rule, then that's not really helpful lol. But then again I don't think I ever played any versions where this could happen because, like the other guy suggested, the puzzles I used to play were all meant to be solvable without guessing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The one most people know from the 1990s (Definitely on Windows 3.1, and probably Win 95) specifically was won only when all non-mine spaces were safely revealed. I know in my own case at least, I determined early on that flags were superfluous and ignored them in favour of better times.

But maybe at some point there was a game mode that let you finish by marking flags only, even when clear squares weren't all revealed? It wouldn't be the main game mode (or even present in the version I know), but I could see if that existed out there somewhere.

edit I saw it confirmed by someone below there are indeed people playing newer versions of the game that have a "guess-free" mode.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that's true on the basic Windows version most people are familiar with?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

All flags must be simultaneously correct for all bombs (none left out) for the win condition to happen. Flag all bombs you're certain of and then guess the rest until you got the right combination

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

And I just jumped on one square to get it over with. If I survived, I could win, otherwise I could start a new game right away. Doh!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think the existence of no guess mode (something that I don't think existed the last time I played stock minesweeper) would prevent people from wanting to try a fun game in a similar vein.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There's a competitive scene for Minesweeper, and they don't use the basic Windows version anymore. Too many issues like this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Oh I see. Does it look similar to the picture above? I'm used to the earlier version.