Technology

59322 readers

5106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

402

Women STEM students up to twice as likely as non-STEM students to have experienced sexism (www.hepi.ac.uk)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We know that women students and staff remain underrepresented in Higher Education STEM disciplines. Even in subjects where equivalent numbers of men and women participate, however, many women are still disadvantaged by everyday sexism. Our recent research found that women who study STEM subjects at undergraduate level in England were up to twice as likely as non-STEM students to have experienced sexism. The main perpetrators of this sexism were not university staff, however, but were men STEM degree students.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I always hope people learn from their experience. I have no idea if they learned anything after interacting with me or assumed I'm some crazy female.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I meant that this quote is extremely humiliating, especially to people for whom it's true. It's hard to learn from cruelty, even if it's unintended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From your perspective, what was cruel? I'm interested in how different people interpret the same scenarios. What would be a more constructive way to address the situation?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I assumed quite a few things. If I guessed correctly, then:

Telling somebody that they are not good enough to talk to because of not knowing how to do that is cruel because it gives them no escape, since they can't change their past, and can't catch on since you won't talk to them.

A constructive way to address the situation would be telling them something more rude and direct, but also less humiliating, like "I didn't ask you to do that", "I wasn't talking to you" or just telling them to fsck off. Just imagining what you'd say if it were a girl behaving this way and reacting accordingly.

That quote doesn't simply lose gender roles in conversation, it uses them to say that the other side is inferior in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Telling somebody that they are not good enough to talk to because of not knowing how to do that is cruel because it gives them no escape

Not really... First, I don't think they ever said that those people "weren't good enough" to talk to. Those are your words.

But also, there is a very obvious "escape" when you're ignorant or uneducated about something. It's called learning.