Selfhosted

40218 readers

1093 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

122

PSA: The Docker Snap package on Ubuntu sucks. (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I spent two hours today trying to figure out why Nextcloud couldn’t read my data directory. Docker wasn’t mounting my data directory. Moved everything into my data directory. Docker couldn’t even see the configuration file.

Turns out the Docker Snap package only has access to files under the /home directory.

Moral of the story: never trust a Snap package.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I also like to run my container platform as a containerized application in another container platform.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Lol. Yeah that was my reaction to the headline as well. "You did what ?"

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Why does Docker has a snap version in the first place anyway? Did Canonical pester them to do it?

Edit:

Nope, it's just Canonical went ahead and publish it there by themselves.

This snap is built by Canonical based on source code published by Docker, Inc. It is not endorsed or published by Docker, Inc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s also offered as part of the installation process at least for Ubuntu server. If you don’t know better it bites you real quick.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Now I know better. No more Ubuntu Server.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It's insane how many things they push as Snaps when they are entirely incompatible with the Snap model.

I think everyone first learns what Snaps are by googling "why doesn't ____ work on Ubuntu?" For me, it was Filebot. Spent an hour or two trying to figure out how the hell to get it to actually, you know, access my files. (This was a few years ago, so maybe things are better now. Not sure. I don't live that Snap life anymore, and I'm not going back.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Double-NAT anyone? 3 times the fun, 2 times the work