this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1099 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59322 readers
4370 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1099
Pornhub blocks North Carolina and Montana as porn regulation spreads (www.theverge.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
404 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is blatantly unconstitutional.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m curious about why. The one law that had been overturned so far was on the basis of government compelled speech, because in addition to age verification, the law required porn sites to have a paragraph talking about how porn makes baby Jesus cry. I’m not so sure ID requirements by themselves are going to have the same outcome.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right to Privacy is the first thing to come to mind. It's worse in that this is not the federal or state government collecting data, it's a private enterprise. After that, there are frankly glaring Freedom of Speech infringements here, as the definition of obscene content is hand-waved. You can talk academically about making crystal meth on YouTube, but somehow specific content is restricted, not due to the protection of civilians, but due to individual tastes.

None of this falls under the purview of the government of the United States. I'm betting it's a rather damaging election year shenanigan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The right to privacy is now in question because of Dobbs. It’s a fucking nightmare of possibilities.