zovits

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
The Sandwich Thief in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

If your comment is sarcasm, then it's brilliant.

Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Ah, I think I got the source of misunderstanding: these mechanisms are not automated, but implemented as moderation guidelines and rules.

Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT in c/[email protected]
Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

SO has mechanisms in place to filter out AI-generated content.

Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Editing any content to reduce its quality is considered vandalism and gets reverted on SO.

Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Except it's not your data anymore. By submitting any content, you transfer the rights to SO.

Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Vandalism is always reverted on SO, even if done by the original author. No knowledge is lost. Suing OA for violating the CC-BY license might be possible, but I'd wager SO is not interested in suing them, and since they hold the rights, not much can be done by others.

It's the same fake argument every time they try to take away your rights in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm all for setting a precedent if it's about banning chinese spyware and propaganda weapons.

Chat Apps in c/[email protected]
Sealioning in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago

The proper response would have been to apologize at the first opportunity.

Google admits it's making YouTube worse for ad block users in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Wait, what?

Aaaaaand it's over in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I always thought it was more like toast.

36
What job doesn't require reading ability? (lemmy.world)
 

Hypothetically, if a colleague has repeatedly demonstrated the utter lack of reading comprehension skills (like pulling the same door labelled "push" for the hundredth time), what job could one suggest for them where this "disability" wouldn't be detrimental?

1
I just realized how incredible it is that we don't have toes growing out of our ears. (lemmy.world)
 

AFAIK it all boils down to the fact that during embryonal development our cells, which at that point were just a blob of undifferentiated autonomous chemical machines, somehow managed to unanimously agree upon the cardinal directions (up-down, left-right, front-back) for future development - and thanks to this, we don't have toes growing out of our ears.

view more: next ›