zbyte64

With the way Biden is going... They probably won't need to 🤦‍♂️

You're right, I answered the question I wished was asked: whether they're planning bloodshed.

What's to stop the ~~monkey paw~~ SCOTUS from simply interpreting a large hole in the amendment?

And I dont really care what people claim or what way you guys are misleading.

I also like to shout into a void for a sense of validation.

I don't think you can approximate Turing complete algorithms though. And then you end up with a situation where the simulation is making these Turing machines out of other simulated components, so it's even more overhead then just giving the simulated agents direct CPU time.

Those stocks won't buy back themselves!

Here's a writer of Project 2025 saying there won't bloodshed as long as you don't resist: https://youtu.be/-OdM4_WO2wk

Nah, more like some dead family members from gang violence (I had a dumb but lovable cousin). But you're right, I can't really say whether they're dieing for a cause, I meant it more as "dieing for a lesser cause" than emancipation.

Gangs die for less. Fred Hampton was going to give them a cause and make them into freedom fighters, and that made the government very very scared.

Some of us have physical disabilities that are not very visible. Prison would be a prescription for even more physical ailments.

Funny thing, it isn't a video ad, that is a still image. Either someone is astroturfing Biden, or someone on his team thought this was a good thumbnail to go with.