The law only cares if they were lobbying for a foreign country. If it was China, India or Australia paying the bill, they would still be breaking the law.
zbyte64
joined 7 months ago
The US loved to hire Nazi scientists after the war.
They knew the people paying them worked from a Russian timezone, they actually put it in an email.
Seems like it has all the risks of fracking 🙃
Do we assume everything read in a textbook is correct? When we get feedback on drawing, do we accept the feedback as always correct and applicable? We filter and groom data for the AI so it doesn't need to learn these things.
Fresno: Here's your bike lanes, we just had to remove 50% of the bus stops to make room.
I was narrowly taking issue with the comparison to how humans learn, I really don't care about copyrights.
I can go look at some Monets and paint some shitty water lillies, is that somehow problematic?
If we're using your paintings as training data for a Monet copy, then it could be.
Are we even talking about AI if we're saying data quality doesn't matter?
I don't understand how when I say "agency" or "an aspect of the process" one would think I'm talking about the volume of information and not the quality.
I'm literally saying (an aspect of) process matters, how are we saying the same thing?
Then I guess my original point of agency being an essential element in human learning had nothing to do with your conversation about how AI learns like humans. Carry on.
Yeah, AIPAC should be illegal to by the same law. Funny how that country gets a free pass.