wolfyvegan

joined 3 weeks ago
 

A sandstorm in central and southern Iraq sent more than 1,800 people to hospitals with respiratory problems on Monday, health officials said.

Iraq, which endures blistering summer heat and regular sandstorms, is one of the five countries most impacted by some effects of climate change, says the United Nations.

The environment ministry has warned the country can expect to experience a rising number of "dust days" in coming decades.

 

A sandstorm in central and southern Iraq sent more than 1,800 people to hospitals with respiratory problems on Monday, health officials said.

Iraq, which endures blistering summer heat and regular sandstorms, is one of the five countries most impacted by some effects of climate change, says the United Nations.

The environment ministry has warned the country can expect to experience a rising number of "dust days" in coming decades.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20863122

By 2020, the global capacity of PV energy had climbed to 760 gigawatts. Much of this came from installations in leading regions like Asia, Europe, and North America. Most systems were built on open ground—often farmland—stirring concern over their effect on food production and ecosystems.

The widespread use of agricultural land for solar farms has sparked fears of shrinking crop yields and harm to biodiversity. Rural communities have voiced worries too, pointing to risks like fewer farming jobs and increased depopulation.

To ease this tension, researchers have turned to agrivoltaics—an idea that dates back to 1982. This dual-use method allows solar panels and crops to share the same land. Early designs let sunlight reach the plants underneath, preserving growing conditions.

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

archived (Wayback Machine)

 

Behind these declines lies a constellation of human-driven threats, with habitat destruction leading the charge. Each year, approximately 10 million hectares of forest — an area nearly the size of Kentucky — disappear to make way for agriculture, urban development, and resource extraction. Particularly devastating is the ongoing destruction of tropical rainforests, Earth’s most biologically diverse terrestrial ecosystems. The Amazon Basin alone has lost roughly 17% of its forest cover in the past 50 years, with deforestation rates accelerating dramatically in recent years despite increased awareness of the region’s critical importance to global climate regulation.

The connection between rainforest destruction and global agricultural systems reveals a particularly troubling cycle of environmental degradation. Vast tracts of pristine forest, especially in South America, are being systematically cleared to grow soybeans — not primarily for direct human consumption, but to feed livestock in industrial animal agriculture operations worldwide. This represents a staggeringly inefficient use of land: producing one pound of beef requires approximately seven pounds of grain, making meat production a principal driver of habitat loss. The irony is profound — forests that once supported immense biodiversity are destroyed to grow monoculture crops that feed animals raised in factory farms, all while greenhouse gas emissions from both deforestation and livestock production accelerate climate change.

archived (Wayback Machine)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

"fruit trees, native trees, and other beneficial vegetation"

Seems likely. Even just "native trees" would almost need to include Inga species, which are legumes, and there are native Amazon nuts like Caryodendron orinocense that might also grow wild in the area.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Let's all remember that while jet aircraft emit much more than other forms of transportation, this is nothing compared to the emissions of animal agriculture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I agree that while reducing emissions from air travel is beneficial, it isn't enough of a solution. However, I think that "pissing off many normal people" is inevitable in the process of arresting climate change, as eliminating animal agriculture is necessary in order to solve the problem. People won't like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Old-growth forest stores more carbon than younger trees, so continually "recycling" fast-growing plants is not superior to letting the forest grow. A combination of syntropic agriculture and forest conservation would probably be more effective.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Syntropic agriculture practices achieve this and some semblance of a forest at the same time. Chop and drop. Smother the grass with mulch.

view more: ‹ prev next ›