So the pro-Biden comments are staying up? Exactly like I said ? lmao
whoreticulture
joined 5 months ago
No reason for this to have been removed
? I entered the conversation pointing out a rude style of communication. You're just continuing it lol. Talking about communication is substantial.
I wasn't arguing with pugjesus, just in contention with their disingenuous communication. PugJesus did not disprove any claims I made. I think you're not following the conversation.
You don't have any evidence one way or the other that everyone understood the counter argument immediately, what he brought up was a relatively obscure historical event and if you disagree with that assertion, I can't even begin to take you seriously.
This is literally the first time you have said you use maps, so yes, you are a liar? Literally?
It's not a discussion because you're not bringing anything to the discussion lmao
Glad you agree, sucks you won't ever change
If you felt there was a contradiction, you could have named that contradiction. All you did was say that you thought the other person hasn't even read it. The tone was not, "oh if you have read Mussolini why do you think he says etc etc when the Doctrine of Fascism says etc etc " it was "I have read a lot and I don't think you have read the things you said you have read"
What you're doing is acting passive aggressively superior at every turn and not making or directly addressing any actual points 🥴 very liberal coded of you, not surprising
Yes exactly. You didn't make any points, you just brought something up. You did explain your point way further down, but, that is only after being called out lmao
they said if you want to learn more about a topic that they described, that you can read Mussolini.
you responsed with a sarcastic "Cool" and said oh by the way have you actually even read Mussolini?
I can't be the first person to tell you how obnoxious you are lol. And I know you know what you're doing lol.
view more: next ›
It's not really dodging a conversation when you enter it being critical of the rhetoric, and not the content. I don't think anyone is fooled but I think you are confused.