Oh whoops, I thought you were trying to be taken seriously. My bad.
teawrecks
joined 1 year ago
Sorry, the way i phrased that does sound causal. It should say "and".
Any real lib knows, public or private, there's no way out of our capitalist downfall.
How are you differentiating stakeholder and shareholder? The employees are certainly shareholders.
Valve doesn't really hire "grunts". The people who are actually considered employees of valve are very few and highly skilled. The number of Wikipedia from 2016 is very out of date and estimates 360. But valve's LinkedIn still says "over 300".
I had briefly searched to see if it was known how much ownership Gaben had. Did you find it somewhere, or are you just assuming he's majority?
I do know the employees are compensated in shares of the company, but you're right that I don't know what proportion is owned by employees.
What makes session less secure? This is the first I've heard of it.
I think this post massively overestimates the power a CEO has. The CEO is beholden to the shareholders. Valve is private, ~~so~~ and its shareholders are its workers. It would be useful to know how many shares Gaben has of valve, but I still don't think the next CEO would suddenly also be the majority owner.
Also, I know things have changed a lot in the last 12 years, but 12 years ago regarding the total dissolution of Valve, Gaben said:
“It’s way more likely we would head in that direction than say, ‘Let’s find some giant company that wants to cash us out and wait two or three years to have our employment agreements terminate."
Also, forcing users onto windows is THE way to kill valve's profits. The whole point of the Linux push was a direct response to the windows store, and msft's threat of forcing valve to give them a cut of purchase through steam. Msft will still do that the first chance it gets. So even the most profit-minded new leader wouldn't make that choice, as it's plainly shortsighted.
I tried this for a while and it was incredibly janky. Heroic launcher is a night and day difference.
Far more success than I'd care to see, imo
- Linux phone. Only a goof option for a tinkering device right now imo.
Honestly not sure if you mean "good" or actually meant "goof" there lol
On the contrary, Apple's track record for collecting data is deliberately obtuse and utilizes dark patterns to make it as difficult as possible to not upload your info to them.
From the article,
the user is given the option to enable Siri, but “enabling” only refers to whether you use Siri's voice control. “Siri collects data in the background from other apps you use, regardless of your choice, unless you understand how to go into the settings and specifically change that,”...“In practice, protecting privacy on an Apple device requires persistent and expert clicking on each app individually"...the steps required are “scattered in different places.”
Apple devices might be arguably more secure than other vendors, but security and privacy are not the same thing.
I think the first half of yours is the same as my first, and I think a lot of artists aren't against AI that produces worse art than them, they're againt AI art that was generated using stolen art. They wouldn't be part of the problem if they could honestly say they trained using only ethically licensed/their own content.
Highly recommend putting that in a quote and giving a source rather than copy pasting a wall in plain text. For all I know you just asked ChatGPT and this is what it spat out.
And in this context, just the part about Gabe being majority shareholder would have sufficed.