And then complaining that those customers are to blame that their business is tanking when in reality they just made them too poor to buy the product and/or killed them off but they will get a bailout anyway because they are "too big to fail".
taladar
Pretty sure it wouldn't be hard to do with something like InvokeAI where you have some basic image editing tools to use before inpainting.
InvokeAI 5.3.1 with the Environment Art setting and an SDXL derived model and 9:16 aspect ratio (otherwise defaults)
That is over 10 years at 4h a day every single day.
Well, could just have started the game, then went to get the doorbell, got hit by a car on his porch and was in a coma for a year before he could get back to close the game.
My point is that Gaza should have no impact on your voting decision at all because not voting, voting Democrats and voting Republicans will get you the same outcome there, which would also be the outcome you got from literally any other US administration or potential administration (as in candidate that lost) in the entire history of Israel's existence.
Which leaves all the other potential considerations. Trust in the Democratic party can certainly be one of those but don't pretend not voting makes you morally better on the Gaza issue itself. That whole "inaction makes me better" mindset when action and inaction have literally the same outcome needs to die because it is literally not true.
I mean judging by the comments people get when they say it is too stressful it could also be considered too relaxing. They always claim everything is optional and that somehow makes the game relaxing but even if I try to do just one of the things I could do the energy and slow walking and passing out mechanics still make it about as relaxing as getting something done in another game while some PvP griefers keep sniping my character randomly in the middle of tasks. At that rate not playing the game is infinitely more relaxing than playing it and just not doing anything at all.
Your return
will return from the function, not from the for loop as you probably assume. The for loop itself does not return a value.
Only loop
based loops can use break
to return values, other loops do not.
You also forgot the let keyword in your assignment
I assume you want to return the value of the href
attribute for the first node that has one? In that case you want something like
fn get_first_href_value(link_nodes: Select) -> Option<String> {
for node in link_nodes {
if let Some(href_value) = node.value().attr("href") {
return Some(href_value.into());
}
}
None
}
or, more idiomatically
fn get_first_href_value(link_nodes: Select) -> Option<String> {
link_nodes.into_iter().find_map(|node| node.value().attr("href")).map(|v| v.to_string())
}
It really isn't for everyone. I tried it and hated every minute of it, super-stressful and tedious and returned it (one of only a handful of games in my Steam collection of a few hundred) because it was advertised as relaxing when it is anything but.
Not voting to absolve yourself from moral responsibility for the outcome is a fallacy though. Many people do believe that inaction somehow makes them less responsible but that just isn't the case. Inaction isn't the magical option, you still have to live with the outcome and you still have all the same opportunity costs as with any choice on the ballot.
If you think you aren't responsible for the events in Israel and Palestine because you didn't vote for either candidate you are just deluding yourself.
That is more along the lines of high government official protection at special events they attend in other countries though, not a standard practice at normal sports games.
It is certainly great news that gccrs doesn't intend to fuck up the Rust ecosystem the way multiple compiler implementations have fucked up other language ecosystems and standards.