rushaction

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's political satire. Read the full plaque again. It is extremely well excuted.

I'm legitimately disappointed the duration for the permit appears to be so short.

Regarding the employment of the personnel who approved the permit, that's uncalled for. I'd recommend reading and internalizing the First Amendment. They really have.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Human remains will only be accepted from bona-fide educational facilities. Contact us for more details.

Likely an explicit no. :(

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

Is it? Sounds a lot like what I'd hope to hear from someone with his history.

Maybe he learned something. People can change, it's just really frickin hard for every one of us.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Quite literally my first thought. Great, but I can't issue certs against that.

One of the major reasons I have a domain name is so that I can issue certs that just work against any and all devices. For resources on my network. Home or work, some thing.

To folks recommending a private CA, that's a quick way to some serious frustration. For some arguably good reasons. On some devices I could easily add a CA to, others are annoying or downright bullshit, and yet others are pretty much impossible. Then that last set that's the most persnickety, guests, where it'd be downright rude!

Being able to issue public certs is easily is great! I don't use .local much because if it's worth naming, it's worth securing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It's to prevent the person from completing a circuit across their chest if accidentally touching a ground or the like with their other arm. Hearts don't like that.

Just a way to reduce risk when working with electricity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The soulless structure of the government is not much different than the soulless structure of a corporation.

Very different for a fundamental reason: at least in the US, one exists to serve the people, the other to extract the maximum amount of profit possible from the people. But to your point, they have similarities in that they are both entirely constructed of flawed humans. That difference in purpose though, makes a huge impact on we interact with them, what we expect of them, and our ability to influence them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

D'oh. I missed that! 😔

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Except Google Pay had the ability to send money to/from friends and bill splitting. Wallet has no such features at all. And nothing they've published or any news on it seems to mention this. (Which has left me somewhat confused that I'm missing something. But as best as I can tell, I'm not)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

But however will it determine the player one controller .... on a desktop computer?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

If you look deeper at the recorded PR commit, comments, and package description it's clearly straight up mean-spirited.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yep, I've even personally witnessed the arguments in business to business sales. When the marketing gets invited, sanity is no longer a welcome.

view more: next ›