I don't disagree, but has anyone found corroborating evidence or documentation, past speculation and reasonable assumption?
redfox
joined 9 months ago
I'm mostly puzzled by how this would be carried out when the vast majority of information seems to be discretionary, interpreted, perceived, opinion. Like the statement I just made ;)
Facts either are or aren't.
Misinformation is vary more challenging because it's usually derived from an event that was a fact, but the interpretation, analysis, significance, etc is based on the person's bias.
Yeah, the second anyone posts anything to any service, all their house are belong to the evil corp...
I just blended two references...
There's so many liers everywhere, how do you even determine misinformation anymore?
How do fact check things and hide it if it's BS?
You only listed 5 ;)
They'll need to start consuming all that extra electricity to power LLMs to analyze climate change data🤔
If you use your email address, they can follow you everywhere. Unless you create tons of throw away emails.
These are good points, well said.
I agree. Insert great power/responsibility saying.
They always seem to go off the rails.
I would be in favor of mandatory disclosure (though, this would be extremely difficult and costly). I imagine anytime a government privilege was used, especially when behind closed doors, and reviewed by "...the proper oversight officials...", whoever that means, I would rather like the governments to prove it.
I would support an idea that by law, it all has to be documented, and after a reasonable amount of time after the prosecution is complete, they have to disclose everything they did, all the snooping, etc. With redacted private information of course for unrelated people.
This is fairly unreasonable/unrealistic. But for me, if you could see all the cases where a government invaded privacy and link it to all to nothing but legitimate uses, it might help restore some faith/trust in officials.
Since I also appreciate EUs privacy mindset, and you guys actually mentioned interesting things about the various populations, I'm going to post devil's advocate question:
Is there anything to allow privacy invasion we should do for law enforcement and CSAM? Since that's all political excuses for it?
Here's a story I heard recently that talks about it from a technician cyber crime podcast: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/131/
Disclaimer: I cried while on a run in the middle of a populated area.
My emotions on the topic go from shock and sadness to the punisher style rage, and what vigilante justice.
There's also apps like kik, where apparently this shit is unchecked.
So my question is, can we all have our no data collection privacy, but still give law enforcement a way to hunt these pieces of shit into extinction without them overreaching?
lifestyle choices
lol, you should have made better choices with the ? thing you can control of those.
/s
That's a bold move cotton, let's see how it plays out for them...