Since you don't understand what an implication is
I understand what an implication is.
I don't understand how you don't get it
I do get what you're trying to say.
Since you don't understand what an implication is
I understand what an implication is.
I don't understand how you don't get it
I do get what you're trying to say.
Can I suggest expressing what you're trying to communicate explicitly, using prose.
"It's unlikely Trump would try to please Putin"
Those words aren't present in the article.
intentionally attacking civilian targets
Uhh.. there's nothing in the article to suggest they intentionally attacked civilian targets, at least from my reading.
I believe that this was already the case. Many moons ago I read a synopsis of a Star Trek show pitch that was slated for development which was set in the future and where warp travel was limited due to the use of an omega bomb. When I watched Discovery, I thought it was just a reworking of that original omega-based idea.
Edit: found it! https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek:_Final_Frontier
the surgery scars did not heal well
Source?
UAV's have been critical in fighting as the underdog against a much larger force.
There's no way for us here to know whether that's because of or in spite of this man.
There's a gay Vulcan character in the New Frontier book series (U.S.S. Excalibur). From what I recall, there were no social issues but the guy's father disapproved due to "a waste of good genetic material" :-)
Why they surrendered in groups, not laying down their lives like their peers at Kursk Bulge?
Indeed, why? Excellent question. Keep asking, you may gain some insight, Mr. Sladkov.
LOL